Upper Karabakh has become a gift to Erdogan
Jan 28, 2024 6:56:30 GMT
Post by account_disabled on Jan 28, 2024 6:56:30 GMT
The Caucasus by favoring his protégé in the area. In this moving game of favors and conditions, Erdogan and Putin move like fish in water. In Nagorno-Karabakh, as perhaps occurs in Ukraine, or in the parts of Ukraine under Russian occupation, fatigue can become unsustainable when it is no longer useful for those who launch, maintain or prolong war options. GRADES (1) “Ukraine's counteroffensive has made progress. But It has much farther to go.” THOMAS GIBBONS-NEFF and LAUREN LEATHERBY. THE NEW YORK TIMES, September 20; (2) “How Ukraine can win a long war. The West needs a strategy after the counteroffensive.” MICK RYAN. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, August 30. (3) “In Washington visit, Zelensky tries to shore up critical support.”
THE NEW YORK TIMES, September 21. (4) “In Ukraine, the shot of a minister and an oligarch.” EMMANUEL GRYNSZPAN. LE MONDE, September 4. (5) “Is Ukraine really interested in fighting corruption.” THE Phone Number Database ECONOMIST, September 4. (6) “Ukraine's forces and firepower are misallocated, US officials said.” THE NEW YORK TIMES, August 23. (7) “Russia doesn't have a good strategy for winning the war” (Interview with Michael Kofman). DER SPIEGEL, September 15. (8) “Democrats and republicans have different views on NATO and Ukraine.” WILLIAM A. GASTON and JORDAN MUCHNICK. BROOKINGS, July 11. (9) “The morality of Ukraine's war is very murky.” STEPHEN WALT. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, September 22. (10) “Poland will no longer send weapons to Ukraine, PM says, as grain dispute escalates.
Although during his electoral campaign he had promised its closure, in 2021 the current president ratified a Defense spending law that made it impossible to fulfill the promise, since it “makes it extremely difficult to use public funds to transfer several prisoners of war from the terrorism to other countries or to American soil to be tried in civil courts of justice.” United States: “the benevolent empire” 21 years have passed since the arrival of the first prisoners . During this period, there have been hundreds of complaints from various international organizations that have been systematically ignored by the United States, whose presidents, however, have known how to take electoral advantage from the controversy that the prison generates .
THE NEW YORK TIMES, September 21. (4) “In Ukraine, the shot of a minister and an oligarch.” EMMANUEL GRYNSZPAN. LE MONDE, September 4. (5) “Is Ukraine really interested in fighting corruption.” THE Phone Number Database ECONOMIST, September 4. (6) “Ukraine's forces and firepower are misallocated, US officials said.” THE NEW YORK TIMES, August 23. (7) “Russia doesn't have a good strategy for winning the war” (Interview with Michael Kofman). DER SPIEGEL, September 15. (8) “Democrats and republicans have different views on NATO and Ukraine.” WILLIAM A. GASTON and JORDAN MUCHNICK. BROOKINGS, July 11. (9) “The morality of Ukraine's war is very murky.” STEPHEN WALT. FOREIGN AFFAIRS, September 22. (10) “Poland will no longer send weapons to Ukraine, PM says, as grain dispute escalates.
Although during his electoral campaign he had promised its closure, in 2021 the current president ratified a Defense spending law that made it impossible to fulfill the promise, since it “makes it extremely difficult to use public funds to transfer several prisoners of war from the terrorism to other countries or to American soil to be tried in civil courts of justice.” United States: “the benevolent empire” 21 years have passed since the arrival of the first prisoners . During this period, there have been hundreds of complaints from various international organizations that have been systematically ignored by the United States, whose presidents, however, have known how to take electoral advantage from the controversy that the prison generates .
